the next president of the united states
The American people are rejecting the Bush Administration by ever-increasing percentages. That may be good news – for the GOP. As leading Democrats stumble toward a mythical “center” in search of votes, one smart Senator is showing how a conservative Republican can win in ’08. Meet the next President of the United States: Chuck Hagel.
Call it Bush Fatigue, and it’s driven by two factors. The first is a widespread perception that Iraq was a mistake. Only 44% of Americans think we did the right thing by invading, yet leading Democrats still refuse to argue against the rationale for war. The second is the growing understanding that the Administration is rife with incompetence and cronyism. Democrats are waiting for this issue to turn voters their way, but incompetence and cronyism are behaviors, not policy positions. A candidate from either party can claim he’ll do better.
Which brings us to Chuck Hagel. A staunch conservative, he’s a media-savvy former broadcaster, a decorated Vietnam veteran with an entrepreneurial background. Despite his right-wing background and his past loyalty to the Bush crowd, he’s been bashing their management of the war for some time now. He never hesitates to point out to reporters that this makes him a “maverick.” And, as a former businessman, he can present himself as the honest and competent “CEO President” we were promised with Bush.
Following Bill Clinton’s lead, none of the top Democratic candidates seem to be brave and honest enough to say what the American people already know: the war was a mistake sold on lies. Faced with two candidates who say that the only problem with Iraq is poor management, who are the voters going to trust: the armchair quarterback or the decorated veteran? And who inspires more confidence on the competence question: the ex-CEO “straight-shooter” with a logically consistent position, or the career politician from the “I-voted-for-it-before-I …” crowd?
Chuck Hagel’s conservative enough to make it through the reactionary hazing of the GOP primaries, yet able to stake out a position as an anti-Bush. The Democrats seem to be deluding themselves again into thinking that events will do for them what they can’t do for themselves. While they wait expectantly, one Republican Senator is walking down the road to the White House.
If Hagel’s the Ghost of Presidents Future, Democrats may echo Ebenezer Scrooge’s question: “Are these the shadows of the things that Will be, or are they shadows of things that May be, only?" The answer’s in their hands.

seems like you missed the weekend interviews with bill that seemed clear [to me] that he stated categorically that IRAQ was a blundering mistake, BUT - now that we're mired in there - we need to finish the job as quickly and smartly as possible... he also pointed out that they turned out a significantly higher % of voting public than the US has in decades...
Posted by: mike | September 22, 2005 at 10:30 AM
Uh, Mike, that's kinda the point for me, a conservative who was against this war from '02. Bush's foreign policy is Clinton foreign policy on steroids. It's in lockstep with the Democratic world-saver tradition of Wilson, Truman, Johnson, and Clinton.
The neo-cons are ex-Dems (or ex-Trotskyites) and chickenhawks to boot. Hagel is a true conservative -- and one who knows what the hell of war is like.
I'll definitely be cutting a check for Hagel.
Posted by: Andrew, Emprical Conservative | September 22, 2005 at 01:41 PM
Is it just me or do Chuck Hagel and Wesley Clark look alike?
Well RJ, you might be right, although I don't think that Hagel would pass the Religious Right smell test. I personally wish Al Gore would run in 2008 but that's not gonna happen. I'll probably end up voting Green in 2008 anyways. I've lost respect for Democrats after they supported Iraq.
Posted by: Agi T. Prop | September 22, 2005 at 05:26 PM
You are assuming a fair election I suppose.
Posted by: big al | September 24, 2005 at 07:08 AM
Hagel won two elections that were counted on his company's voting machines. The last thing he wants is a fair election.
Posted by: gmanedit | September 27, 2005 at 08:53 AM
Methinks Gore will be a runnin', using sly fox-like tactics for now, then boom thru the backdoor of the coop.
Posted by: "Collective Idiots on the Hill" | February 13, 2006 at 03:55 PM
I am running a social experiment to see how well the "crowd" on the Internet can predict the winner of the 2008 Presidential Race of the United States. Make your prediction at the link below. Please enter one name only.
http://inchorus.com/index.php?page=contribute&project_id=41
Posted by: advenxure | December 14, 2006 at 09:17 PM