Okay, I know it's a surprising conclusion, but hear me out.
As far back as April of 2001, the man some call "The Architect" wrote in a memo to Paul Wolfowitz that the anthrax vaccine was "a political problem for us." That's right. Rove was worried about the very same thing Bruce Ivins was allegedly worried about: the anthrax vaccine.
And consider the targets of those anthrax attacks: As Senate Majority Leader, Tom Daschle was the Democrat most strategically placed to block Rove's political agenda. Then there's Patrick Leahy. As chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Leahy was in an excellent position to investigate whatever shenanigans Rove was already planning over at the Justice Department. (That attack was a rare tactical error on Rove's part, however. As a longtime Grateful Dead fan, Leahy is unusually drug-resistant.)
Tom Brokaw at NBC was yet another target. Rove was publicly embarrassed on NBC during the 2000 election when he claimed Florida for Bush and was contradicted on-air by Tim Russert. And who was NBC's anchor that night? Chill alert: Tom Brokaw.
(People, including me, gave NBC's David Gregory a hard time for "dancing" with Rove last year. But if we knew then what Gregory knew - about what the man is capable of doing when angered - well, heck, son. You'd dance too.)
The there's the Big One, of course: These attacks contributed to an atmosphere of terror that allowed Rove to win (at least temporarily) the political dominance he'd always craved.
Okay, that pretty much covers motive. Then there's the matter of character. Our suspect, a man in his fifties, has a history of grievous misbehavior that dates back to his college days. He acknowledges entering a Democratic politician's office at the tender age of 19 and stealing materials in order to carry out an elaborate deception. And accounts of his high school student years characterize him as "a nerd and a motor mouth," which covers the "weirdness" angle that all these accusations of high-profile murder require.
Did I mention that he likes to go quail-hunting? With a rifle? A deadly weapon? And now our potential "perp" is under investigation by the Congress of the United States for a number of alleged crimes.
So let's see: We've covered "motive" and "character." That leaves "opportunity," which is an easy one. As a close confidant of the President, Rove had access to pretty much every government resource (civilian or military) that he wanted. That would include grades of anthrax that, unlike those discussed by the FBI yesterday, were powdered and weaponized.
Do we really believe Karl Rove is the anthrax killer? Of course not. This is satire, not some wacky conspiracy theory. And after all, who in their right mind would accuse someone of something so serious with such sketchy and circumstantial evidence?
Oh. Right.

dude, don't apologize for stating what I think is exactly the explanation for this whole bizarre anthrax issue. How to explain the amazing "coincidence" that this anthrax "attack" happened within days of 9/11? And I've been hearing from legal commentaters that it would be very hard to make a case against this guy, so if his own lawyer would be telling him the same thing, why did he "commit suicide"? Like Marilyn Monroe mysteriously "committed suicide" when she was on the verge of spilling the beans on her Kennedy affairs. Yea, right.
Whether it was Rove or Cheney & the neo-cons who were salivating to start a war with Iraq, I'm very inclined to believe this anthrax hoax was an effort to ramp up the fear and steer America to support the "war on terror". To me, that is the only viable explanation. This guy had provided anthrax to some "mysterious" agents of the US government who had approached this guy to be a "true hero" and help his country "do the right thing and protect democracy by his clandestine efforts" in providing the materials to these Cheney agents who then mailed it out.
Posted by: bc | August 08, 2008 at 04:14 PM
I agree with your conclusions and have been wondering why the main stream media has investigated these issues
Posted by: Charlotte Malone | August 22, 2008 at 08:50 AM