Apparently the august and statesmanlike Mr. Rush Hudson Limbaugh III (his real name) was a little displeased by our piece in the Huffington Post this weekend, "Why Progressives Keep Losing and the Right Keeps Winning." He read it out loud on his show this morning, and I'm about to say something about that which might shock and surprise you:
He was neither as courteous as one might hope nor as well-informed as once might expect. Disappointing, I know.
Rush spent nearly ten minutes of air time reading my piece and commenting on it. (The audio and the transcript are below.) It wasn't all bad: After initially mispronouncing my name, he corrected himself and said it correctly. The man's a pro; gotta give him that. Almost nobody gets my name right.
You'll notice that he does change my words in one way: Whenever "Democratic Party" appears in the text he says "Democrat Party" instead. Oh, and he calls the Huffington Post the "Huffington Puffington Post." Très drôle, no?
Rush was furious at the suggestion that the Right won this weekend's negotiation. Do you feel like you won? he asked his listeners. Who cares? Judging by the hate mail I've received since the show aired, I doubt his listeners can feel their toes.
But what really seemed to get his goat (and quite a horned beast that animal must be!) was this:
Where's the progressive vision for 2021? Where's the dream people can seize upon and make their own? Where's the ideal that can energize activists? Where's the extreme position from which the Democrats can be "bargained down" so that they, too, can only get 20% more than they asked for when the negotiations began? If they're not going to do it, we have to do it for them.
Here's a start: First increase Social Security retirement benefits by 15%, across the board, by lifting the payroll tax cap and imposing a financial transactions tax. Second, increase income taxes on a sliding scale that goes up to 60% for the highest earners in the country. (It's been as high as 90% during periods of our greatest prosperity.) Third, add $500 billion to our stimulus spending over the next two years, and keep adding it until unemployment is down to 4%. Fourth, immediately add a public option, "Medicare For All" plan that's voluntarily available to Americans of all age brackets.
That paragraph has really aggravated the Right, I guess. RedState.com and Hot Air both took strong exception to it as well. We might be on to something. The left really needs to think big, doesn't it?
The big fella also took exception to my assertion that progressive ideas are more popular than those of the Right. Clearly neither he nor his producers clicked on the links, which provide data from a number of polls which prove my point. Facts are troublesome things.
Afterwards he lambasted Paul Krugman, too, before answering my rhetorical question: "Why do you keep losing? Because you elected a false messiah!"
What was really interesting to me was the rage some of his callers directed toward the Republicans. Rushbo's really just a highly-paid Republican Party operative at heart, born into a family of Republican functionaries, although he tries to hide it. He seemed pretty disconcerted by the intensity of their emotion. Rush and his party have channeled a lot of white rage, but there's a chance it could backfire.
Some of that rage is irrational, and some is justifiable anger that's been misdirected. It should be channeled instead toward Wall Street, the big corporations who control the United States Chamber of Commerce, and the plutocrats' political operatives - a group that includes the Republican Party, the Tea Party's backers, and Rush Limbaugh.
Now the Partiers are so worked up that, judging from Rush's callers, nothing less than total annihilation of the Federal government will satisfy them. Of course, then they'll be a little upset when their Social Security check doesn't arrive.
Or their disability check. Or their Medicare coverage. Or when they're poisoned by bad groundwater because the EPA's been shuttered. Or when they're swept away in a flood because the GOP has cut disaster preparedness and emergency warning funds. Or when their house is burglarized because the Republican Congress has cut funds for supporting and training local and state law enforcement.
But in the meantime, that inchoate and uncontrollable rage could make things a little awkward for Rush as he tries to navigate the rockyshoals that lie between his audience's fury and his servility toward the Republican Party. My message for the Tea Party is this: Those political guys'll just use you, folks, and so will their highly-paid operatives like Rush Limbaugh. Start listening to people who will tell you the truth. (And hey, I'm sorry about what I said back there. You know, the toes thing? I was just mad. I know that the vast majority of you did not write me nasty emails, so that was uncalled for.)
Like the saying goes: He who rides the tiger cannot dismount. (It's just a saying, Rush. I'm not suggesting that actual tigers were present at any point during this debate.)
___________________
Here's Rush reading what I've written. I wonder how he'd sound reading poetry? I'm thinking Edna St. Vincent Millay, but I'm open to suggestions.
Rushbo reads RJ
Here's the entire segment, if you're filled with morbid curiosity:
Rushbo segment
And here's the transcript: